Sports
Vasco Pick Engenhão for Clássico Against Flamengo
President Pedrinho's decision to move the Brasileirão derby to Nilton Santos sparks debate over politics and venue rights.
Vasco's push to relocate their derby against Flamengo to Estádio Nilton Santos has raised questions about behind-the-scenes motives. Commentator Bernardo Ramos breaks down the political friction, the Maracanã consortium fallout, and both clubs' current form.
Vasco da Gama plan to host their upcoming Campeonato Brasileiro derby against Flamengo on Thursday at Estádio Nilton Santos. Club president Pedrinho justified the move by claiming that playing at the Maracanã could damage the pitch at the iconic venue. Vasco's initial plan was to play at São Januário, but the Brazilian Football Confederation (CBF) vetoed the stadium due to security concerns.
In the video above, Bernardo Ramos analyzes the backstage maneuvers and highlights contradictions in the Vasco board's stance regarding the Maracanã. Bernardo argues that citing pitch conditions rings hollow given recent history, such as the match against Boca Juniors, when the club insisted on playing at Rio de Janeiro's flagship stadium. Vasco lost that game 3–1, and the Fla-Flu Serviços SA consortium tallied over R$ 300,000.00 in property damage—a bill that could lead to legal action.
PUBLICIDADE (GAM) — 1250x250
Venue Contradictions and Behind-the-Scenes Friction
In Bernardo's view, Pedrinho's reasoning ignores his own stated order of stadium preferences: São Januário first, the Maracanã second, and Engenhão third. Opting directly for Botafogo's home ground while skipping the second choice reflects ongoing friction between Vasco's leadership and Flamengo president Bap (Luiz Eduardo Batista).
Beyond the political squabble, Bernardo emphasizes that Flamengo remain clear favorites on the pitch, regardless of where the derby is played. The last encounter between the rivals at São Januário—during the 2020 Campeonato Brasileiro behind closed doors due to the pandemic—ended in a 2–1 comeback win for Flamengo. While noting that Leonardo Jardim's tenure at the helm of Flamengo is showing signs of strain and is unlikely to last through 2027, the commentator stresses that Flamengo's squad outclasses Vasco, who are still fighting to steer clear of the Brasileirão relegation zone.
SAF Ownership Model and Conflict of Interest
Another key topic involves the clubs' differing governance models. While Vasco celebrate progress in negotiations over their SAF (football corporation) with Marcos Lamacchia, Flamengo rule out transitioning to a club-company model under Bap's administration. Bernardo reiterates his skepticism regarding the irreversible loss of political control under SAF structures, where owners cannot be removed by club members.
Finally, Bernardo warns that regulators and the CBF must scrutinize Marcos Lamacchia's involvement in Vasco's football operations, noting he is the stepson of Leila Pereira and son of Zé Roberto Lamacchia. With Leila serving as president of Palmeiras and both teams set to clash in the Copa do Brasil semifinals, the commentator points to a potential conflict of interest within Brazilian football.
PUBLICIDADE (GAM) — 1250x250
