Leila Pereira Disrespects Flamengo Over Libertadores Appeal
Palmeiras president criticized the club's CAS appeal regarding Marcos Rojo's eligibility in the semifinals.
Leila Pereira claimed that Flamengo should show humility and withdraw its CAS appeal against Estudiantes. Bernardo Ramos analyzes the legal ramifications and criticizes the Palmeiras president's stance.
Palmeiras president Leila Pereira disrespected Flamengo during an interview on the São Paulo club's official channel, stating that the Rio club's board should wear the sandals of humility and drop the legal dispute surrounding the Copa Libertadores semifinals.
For commentator Bernardo Ramos, in the video above, the statement oversteps the bounds of institutional respect and disregards the Rio club's legal backing. Flamengo released an official statement on Saturday (25) laying out a detailed chronology of the proceedings contesting defender Marcos Rojo's appearance in the match at the Maracanã.
The Legal Timeline and the Appeal to CAS
The case began when Estudiantes consulted the South American Football Confederation (CONMEBOL) regarding the registration of Marcos Rojo. The South American governing body forwarded the request to the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA), which vetoed the defender's eligibility. Following the rejection, the Argentine club turned to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). The tribunal granted authorization for the player to appear in the semifinal second leg, but denied Estudiantes any guarantee of immunity against prospective sporting and disciplinary sanctions.
Immediately following the final whistle, Flamengo formally filed an action with the arbitration tribunal against the ineligible player's inclusion. The objective of the appeal is the enforcement of competition regulations, which would result in a 3–0 default victory for the Brazilian club. Ramos believes the club is fully justified in asserting its sporting rights in light of the maneuver carried out by its opponent.
Estudiantes' Past and the Final Decision
Ramos points out that Estudiantes historically carries a track record of controversial episodes on and off the pitch, recalling the 1969 Intercontinental Cup final against Milan, when players like Poletti and Manera were arrested for extreme violence. Viewed in that light, the conduct of the club from La Plata in this latest case should not serve as any ethical benchmark.
While acknowledging that Flamengo's performance at the Maracanã was poor, Ramos argues that on-pitch form does not invalidate legal rights. The analyst also notes that Leila Pereira's reaction raises questions over whether the executive fears facing Flamengo in the final scheduled for November 28 in Montevideo. The final CAS ruling is expected to be delivered on November 12.